Rights and Wellbeing at Work Chart – Figure 2.1

This chart is measuring the Value-Chain Impact (VCI) and the Operational Impacts (OI) of given data (ex: Right to Organize) on a 0 to 12 scale. 0 being considered low impact, 8 being considered medium impact, and 12 being considered high impact.

The data is as follows:

Safe and Healthy Working Conditions:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Respectful and Inclusive Workplace Culture:
VCI Value – 7
OI Value – 6

Respect for Group Rights and Protections:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 6

Healthy and Inclusive Workplace Design:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 6

Good Health and Wellbeing:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 6

Human Dignity and Integrity:
VCI Value – 7
OI Value – 7

Decent Work/Income and Work-Life Balance:
VCI Value – 5
OI Value – 6

Right to Organize:
VCI Value – 3
OI Value – 6

Family Support:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 6

The chart concludes.

Rights and Resilience in Communities Chart – Figure 2.2

This chart is measuring the Value-Chain Impact (VCI) and the Operational Impacts (OI) of given data (ex: Local Economic Resilience and Decent Local Work) on a 0 to 12 scale. 0 being considered low impact, 8 being considered medium impact, and 12 being considered high impact.

The data is as follows:

Public Safety and Emergency Services:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Respectful and Inclusive Community:
VCI Value – 7
OI Value – 6

Healthy and Natural Spaces:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 6

Food:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 6

Good Health and Wellbeing:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 6

Human Dignity and Integrity:
VCI Value – 7
OI Value – 7

Local Economic Resilience and Decent Local Work:
VCI Value – 5
OI Value – 6

Social and Cultural Connections and Civil Engagement:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 4

Education, Knowledge, and Skills:
VCI Value – 5
OI Value – 3

Water, Sanitation, and Waste Management:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 3

Housing and Land:
VCI Value – 10
OI Value – 7

Energy:
VCI Value – 3
OI Value – 3

Inclusive Banking, Credit, and Insurance:
VCI Value – 5
OI Value – 3

Information, Innovation, and Telecommunication Services:
VCI Value – 5
OI Value – 3

Transportation and Mobility:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 7

The chart concludes.

Governance and Ethics Chart – Figure 2.3

This chart is measuring the Value-Chain Impact (VCI) and the Operational Impacts (OI) of given data (ex: Anti-Corruption and Anti-Bribery) on a 0 to 12 scale. 0 being considered low impact, 8 being considered medium impact, and 12 being considered high impact.

The data is as follows:

Respect for Rule of Law:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 9

Respecting Traditional and Community Knowledge:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 8

Empowerment:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Business Practices, Ethics, and Consumer Rights:
VCI Value – 5
OI Value – 6

Fair Tax and Benefit Sharing:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 6

Accessible and Transparent Grievance Mechanisms:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 6

Fair and Equitable Dispute Resolution:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 6

Accountability, Transparency, and Disclosure:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 6

Anti-Corruption and Anti-Bribery:
VCI Value – 7
OI Value – 7

Cybersecurity and Data Protection:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 6

Wealth Disparity and Excess Compensation:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 6

The chart concludes.

Materials and Waste Chart – Figure 2.4

This chart is measuring the Value-Chain Impact (VCI) and the Operational Impacts (OI) of given data (ex: Product Stewardship) on a 0 to 12 scale. 0 being considered low impact, 8 being considered medium impact, and 12 being considered high impact.

The data is as follows:

Material and Resource Stewardship:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 9

Process Residuals and other Wastes:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 8

Product Stewardship:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Packaging Waste:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

The chart concludes.

Ecosystems Chart – Figure 2.5

This chart is measuring the Value-Chain Impact (VCI) and the Operational Impacts (OI) of given data (ex: Natural Resource Management) on a 0 to 12 scale. 0 being considered low impact, 8 being considered medium impact, and 12 being considered high impact.

The data is as follows:

Biodiversity:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 9

Natural Resource Management:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 8

Invasive Species:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Land Use and Relinquishment Rehabilitation:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Protected Spaces:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

The chart concludes.

Water (Marine and Fresh) Chart – Figure 2.6

This chart is measuring the Value-Chain Impact (VCI) and the Operational Impacts (OI) of given data (ex: Water Governance) on a 0 to 12 scale. 0 being considered low impact, 8 being considered medium impact, and 12 being considered high impact.

The data is as follows:

Water Quantity:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 9

Water Quality:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 8

Water Governance:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

The chart concludes.

Pollutants Chart – Figure 2.7

This chart is measuring the Value-Chain Impact (VCI) and the Operational Impacts (OI) of given data (ex: Hazardous Chemicals) on a 0 to 12 scale. 0 being considered low impact, 8 being considered medium impact, and 12 being considered high impact.

The data is as follows:

Nitrogen and Phosphorous:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 9

Hazardous Chemicals:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 8

Particulates:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Gaseous Air Quality Pollutants:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Metals:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Radiation:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Noise Pollution:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Light Pollution:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

The chart concludes.

Climate Chart – Figure 2.8

This chart is measuring the Value-Chain Impact (VCI) and the Operational Impacts (OI) of given data (ex: Climate Mitigation) on a 0 to 12 scale. 0 being considered low impact, 8 being considered medium impact, and 12 being considered high impact.

The data is as follows:

Climate Scenario Informed Decision-making:
VCI Value – 9
OI Value – 9

Climate Mitigation:
VCI Value – 8
OI Value – 8

Climate Adaptation and Risk Preparedness:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

Renewable Energy Development:
VCI Value – 6
OI Value – 8

The chart concludes.

Gender Identity Pie chart – Figure 2.1

Out of 655 responses, 75% identified as men, 20% identified as women, 4% preferred not to say.

Prefer to self-identify, Gender Identity not specified and transgender people all recorded 0% of responses.

Sexual Orientation Pie chart – Figure 2.2

Out of 632 responses, 84% identified as heterosexual, 14% preferred not to say and 3% identified under Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Queer, Pansexual, Asexual, Two-spirit or under other similar categorizations.

Indigeneity Pie chart – Figure 2.3

Out of 634 responses, 79% identified as non-indigenous, 14% identified as indigenous and 7% preferred not to say.

Race Pie chart – Figure 2.4

Out of 655 responses, 78% identified as White, 8% preferred not to say, 3% had their racial identity not listed, 3% identified as Mixed Race, 2% identified as Black, 2% identified as East Asian, 1% identified as Latin American/Hispanic, 1% identified as South Asian, 1% identified as West Asian and 1% identified as Southeast Asian.

First Language Pie chart – Figure 2.5

Out of 784 responses, 64% responded English, 26% responded French, 7% responded another language and 3% preferred not to say,

Primary Language Pie chart – Figure 2.6

Out of 747 responses, 74% responded English, 17% responded French, 6% responded another language and 3% preferred not to say,

Persons with Disabilities Pie chart – Figure 2.7

Out of 655 responses, 87% identified as currently living without a disability, 7% identified as currently living with a disability, 7% preferred not to say.

Incremental Net Present Value (NPV) – Figure 5.2.

A bar graph that illustrates Alamos’ Abatement Potential, which means the extent of their potential greenhouse gas reductions, as opposed to NPV for each Abatement Potential, which means the total value of their investment into reaching those potential reductions.

Y Axis – Titled ‘NPV Per Abatement Potential (USD/tCO(2)e)’ which means US dollars (USD) per tonnes (t) of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent (e). This axis is on a scale from -1000 to 1000 with increments of +500. This axis also has data in negative values up to -479 that are not listed on the scale itself.

X Axis – Titled ‘Abatement Potential (kt CO(2)e)’ which means kilotons (kt) of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent (e). This axis is on a scale from 0 to 980 with increments of 60 and one increment of 80 between datapoint 780 and 860. Each bar is coloured to represent one of Alamos’ four main sites: Young-Davidson, Island Gold, Lynn Lake and Mulatos.

The following describes the data on the chart in order of appearance (left to right on the X axis) and does not attempt to categorize them by the Alamos mine they pertain to.


Island Gold – Ventilation on demand (VOD)

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -479

Abatement Potential –


Young-Davidson – Propane replaced with CNG

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -241

Abatement Potential –


Lynn Lake – Electric Hydraulic Mining Shovels

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -114

Abatement Potential –


Lynn Lake – EV Production Drills

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -83

Abatement Potential –


Island Gold – Mine ventilation air heat recovery unit

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -74

Abatement Potential –


Lynn Lake – Biodiesel

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -72

Abatement Potential –


Young-Davidson – Pipe B50 Biodiesel all year

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -68

Abatement Potential –


Mulatos – Biodiesel

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -39

Abatement Potential –


Mulatos – Biodiesel

NPV Per Abatement Potential – -4

Abatement Potential –


Mulatos – Renewable Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 0

Abatement Potential –


Island Gold – Renewable Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 1

Abatement Potential –


Young-Davidson – Pipe B20 Biodiesel during winter

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 18

Abatement Potential –


Mulatos – Renewable Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 23

Abatement Potential –


Mulatos – BEV Pickup Trucks

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 23

Abatement Potential –


Lynn Lake – Hybrid Haul Trucks

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 158

Abatement Potential –


Island Gold – BEV Underground Hauler

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 168

Abatement Potential –


Young-Davidson – BEV Pickup Truck

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 260

Abatement Potential –


Young-Davidson – BEV Underground Haulers

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 269

Abatement Potential –


Mulatos – Solar (25%)

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 367

Abatement Potential –


Young-Davidson – BEV Scoops

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 450

Abatement Potential –


Island Gold – Wind (25%)

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 509

Abatement Potential –


Island Gold – BEV Pickup Truck

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 516

Abatement Potential –


Young-Davidson – Wind (25%)

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 602

Abatement Potential –


Island Gold – BEV Scoops

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 836

Abatement Potential –


Lynn Lake – BEV Transport Haul Trucks

NPV Per Abatement Potential – 1015

Abatement Potential –

Alamos 30% Reduction Pathway – Figure 5.3

A mixed line and bar chart with two y axis and an x axis. The x axis depicts data for every year between 2021 and 2030. The first y axis depicts Alamos’ Greenhouse Gas Emissions (tCO2e) for the line chart and is on a scale ranging from 70000 to 190000 tonnes of C02 equivalent with data comprised of Alamos’ various emission measurements/targets. The second y axis depicts Alamos’ Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions (tCO2e/year), which means it shows the total reductions year over year based on the previous year listed for the bar chart (starting in 2023). The data for the years past 2022 are projections/targets for Alamos’ reductions.

Line chart:

30% Reduction target GHG emissions (tCO2e)

2021: 169749.049

2022: 164090.747

2023: 158432.445

2024: 152774.144

2025: 147115.842

2026: 141457.541

2027: 135799.239

2028: 130140.937

2029: 124482.636

2030: 118824.334


Resulting Emissions (tCO2e)

2021: 184279.163

2022: 183228.71

2023: 157395.613

2024: 134180.201

2025: 145723.198

2026: 131911.773

2027: 122134.561

2028: 117497.327

2029: 119687.449

2030: 115165.172


1.5 Degree Target GHG Emissions (tCO2e)

2021: 169749.049

2022: 162619.589

2023: 155490.129

2024: 148360.669

2025: 141231.209

2026: 134101.748

2027: 126972.288

2028: 119842.828

2029: 112713.368

2030: 105583.908


BAU Emissions (tCO2e)

2021: 184279.163

2022: 183228.71

2023: 171436.194

2024: 148220.782

2025: 165579.756

2026: 151768.331

2027: 141991.119

2028: 126746.086

2029: 128936.207

2030: 124413.93


Bar Chart


GHG Reductions (tCO2e/year)

2021: N/A

2022: N/A

2023: 14040.581

2024: 14040.581

2025: 19856.558

2026: 19856.558

2027: 19856.558

2028: 9248.759

2029: 9248.759

2030: 9248.759

Combined Scope 1 and 2 GHG Emissions Annual Comparison by Site – Figure 5.4

A horizontal bar chart depicting the Greenhouse Gas emissions in tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) per scope 1 and 2 (which represent the years 2021 and 2022) for each of Alamos’ main mines, Mulatos, Island Gold and Young-Davidson. The x axis scale (tCO2) starts at 0 and goes to 160000 with increments of 200000.

Mulatos – GHG Emissions

Scope 1 (2021) – 136810

Scope 2 (2022) – 128604

6% decrease from 2021


Island Gold – GHG Emissions

Scope 1 (2021) – 15937

Scope 2 (2022) – 17380

9% increase from 2021


Young-Davidson – GHG Emissions

Scope 1 (2021) – 36468

Scope 2 (2022) – 31724

13% decrease from 2021

Emission Intensity Reduction Based On 2023 GHG Reduction Strategy – Figure 5.5

Y Axis – Emission Intensity (tCO2e/oz Au). Scale – 0.0 to 1.0 with increments of 0.1.

X Axis – Dataset – Open Pit Average, Overall Average, Underground Average, Alamos Base Year, Alamos – 2030 with 30% Target

Emission Intensity (tCO2e/oz Au):

Open Pit Average – 0.79

Overall Average – 0.67

Underground Average – 0.47

Alamos Base Year – 0.38

Alamos – 2030 with 30% Target – 0.17